The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the Second Amendment was not adopted "to afford rights to individuals with respect to private gun ownership or possession." Considering our recorded history, one could reasonably ask: Did the 9th Circuit judges abrogate the history of our nation, ignore the grievances that compelled us to separate from England. A simpler question is: What part of "shall not be infringed" is not understood?
Read Original at: Magic City Morning Star