Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

Mississippi: Local Elected Officials Trying to Torpedo Pro-Gun Legislation, HB 314

Sunday, January 26, 2014

Act Today to Help Restore Your Rights!


After House Bill 2 finally became law last year, local officials in many cities and counties across the state over-reacted by passing far-reaching restrictions on where law-abiding citizens – including enhanced and regular carry permit holders – could possess firearms.  The language in HB 2 clarified the definition of “concealed” and re-affirmed the right to possess a firearm openly.  Following its enactment, the media was full of reports of local elected officials taking drastic steps to ban firearms from nearly all city or county-owned property.  Not only were some of these ordinances and actions clearly outside the scope of their authority under state law, they also ended up mostly impacting regular permit holders who had been carrying lawfully and responsibly in these locations since 1991.
      
In December of 2013, Attorney General Jim Hood (D) issued an opinion affirming that the state firearms preemption statute limits cities’ and counties’ authority to enact and enforce ordinances restricting both open and concealed carry, except under limited circumstances.  Attorney 
General Hood opined that a local government can enact and enforce an ordinance prohibiting concealed carry under a regular permit or open carry only at the following locations:

  • A public park or at a public meeting of the municipality or other municipal governmental body.
  • A political rally, parade or official political meeting.
  • A non-firearm-related school, college or professional athletic event.

The authority of cities and counties over enhanced permit holders is even more limited. Enhanced permit holders may carry in a “meeting place of a governmental entity or to a non-firearm-related school, college or professional athletic event" under the authority of the enhanced permit law.
     
Clearly, cities’ and counties’ ordinance-making powers are very limited under the state firearms preemption law, and yet dozens of illegal ordinances remain on the books that ban ALL firearm possession – open or concealed, licensed or not – from ALL city or county property.  In most cases, criminal penalties are established for violations of these illegal ordinances!
      
Some local governments have simply chosen to post all city and county-owned property off-limits to firearms. 
 These signs have created “self-defense-free zones” for persons issued permits by the state to carry for personal protection.  While the Attorney General’s opinion affirmed the authority of local governments to post signs on any property under their control to restrict access by regular permit holders, his opinion also pointed out that signage cannot be used by local governments to restrict entry by enhanced permit holders except in; police, sheriff or highway patrol stations, places of nuisance, detention facilities and prisons or jails.  Also, posting by local governments cannot be used to ban open carry on public property, except where the firearms preemption law allows (public parks, public meetings of a city, county or other governing body, political rallies, parades, or other official political meetings, or non-firearm-related school, college or professional athletic events.)  The flurry of signs that have gone up all over the state on all city and county-owned property can really only legally impact regular permit holders – persons who had been lawfully carrying in most of these locations since 1991.
      
Last week we reported on House Bill 314 filed by state Representative Andy Gipson (R-77), which would clarify limits on the authority of municipalities and counties to restrict the carrying of 
firearms and also provide a legal remedy for citizens who are adversely impacted by local gun control ordinances enacted outside the scope of this authority. However, powerful associations of local elected officials are aggressively lobbying against HB 314, claiming it strips them of powers they don’t legally have.
      
It is critical that you contact your state Representative, as well as members of the House Judiciary B Committee, where HB 314 has been referred, and urge them to stop the proliferation of illegal local firearms ordinances across Mississippi by PASSING House Bill 314.  
Contact information for the House Judiciary Committee B can be found below:
      
Contact information for committee members and your state Representative can be found here.

    
House Judiciary Committee B

       
Representative Andy Gipson (R-77), Chairman
(601) 359-1541
[email protected]
       
Representative Kimberly L. Campbell (D-72), Vice-Chairman
(601) 956-5771
[email protected]
     
Representative Jeramey D. Anderson (D-110)
(855) 537-2639
[email protected]
     
Representative Willie Bailey (D-49)
(601)359-9311
[email protected]
     
Representative Nick Bain (D-2)
(601)359-3338
[email protected]
     
Representative Charles Busby (R-111)
(228)769-0501 (W) 
[email protected]
     
Representative Gary Chism (R-37)
(601)359-3364
[email protected]
     
Representative Dennis DeBar (R-105)
(601)359-2436
[email protected]
  
Representative Deborah Butler Dixon (D-63)
(601)359-3339
[email protected]
     
Representative Jeffrey S. Guice (R-114)
(601)359-2508
[email protected]
     
Representative Joey Hood (R-35)
(601)359-3339
[email protected]
    
Representative Kevin Horan (D-24)
(601)359-2438
[email protected]
     
Representative Timmy Ladner (R-93)
(601)359-2438
[email protected]
     
Representative Sherra Hillman Lane (D-86)
(601)359-9485
[email protected]
     
Representative Sam C. Mims, V (R-97)
(601)359-3320
[email protected]
     
Representative Alex Monsour (R-54)
(601)415-7274
[email protected]
    
Representative John L. Moore (R-60)
(601)359-3330
[email protected]
     
Representative Brad A. Oberhousen (D-73)
(601)359-2439
[email protected]
     
Representative Ferr Smith (D-27)
(601)359-9395
[email protected]
     
Representative Tommy Taylor (R-28)
(662)843-8014 (H)
[email protected]
     
Representative Joseph L. Warren (D-90)
(601)359-3014
[email protected]
     
Representative Jason White (R-48)
(601)359-2861
[email protected]
     
Representative Patricia H. Willis (R-95)
(228)323-4225
[email protected]
     
Representative Adrienne Wooten (D-71)
(601)359-2433
[email protected]
     
Representative Henry Zuber III (R-113)
(601)359-3328
[email protected]

  

TRENDING NOW
Massachusetts: Progressives Pass Radical Gun Control Bill

Friday, July 19, 2024

Massachusetts: Progressives Pass Radical Gun Control Bill

Progressive politicians in Massachusetts just passed one of the most extreme gun control bills in the country.

Massachusetts: Gov. Healey Signs Radical Gun Control Into Law

Thursday, July 25, 2024

Massachusetts: Gov. Healey Signs Radical Gun Control Into Law

On Thursday, July 25th, Governor Maura Healey (D) signed H. 4885, "an act modernizing firearm laws," one of the most extreme gun control bills in the country, into law.

Trump’s Running Mate, JD Vance, is a True Second Amendment Champion

News  

Monday, July 22, 2024

Trump’s Running Mate, JD Vance, is a True Second Amendment Champion

Last week, Sen. JD Vance (R-OH), accepted the Republican party’s nomination for vice president at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, WI.

Massachusetts: Senate Passes Sweeping Gun Control Without Public Hearing

Friday, February 2, 2024

Massachusetts: Senate Passes Sweeping Gun Control Without Public Hearing

On Thursday, February 1st, the Senate passed S.2572 late in the night without the bill ever receiving a public hearing, ignoring the concerns of Minority Leader Bruce Tarr and second amendment advocates across the state. 

NRA Scores Legal Victory Against ATF; “Pistol Brace Rule” Enjoined From Going Into Effect Against NRA Members

Monday, April 1, 2024

NRA Scores Legal Victory Against ATF; “Pistol Brace Rule” Enjoined From Going Into Effect Against NRA Members

NRA Members Among the Largest Class Protected from Draconian Rule

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging ATF’s “Engaged in the Business” Rule

News  

Second Amendment  

Monday, July 22, 2024

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging ATF’s “Engaged in the Business” Rule

The National Rifle Association of America (NRA) has filed a lawsuit challenging the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ (ATF) “Engaged in the Business” Final Rule. The ATF’s Final Rule unlawfully redefines when a person ...

Appeals Court: 21+ Age Requirement for Carry Permits is Unconstitutional

News  

Monday, July 22, 2024

Appeals Court: 21+ Age Requirement for Carry Permits is Unconstitutional

In another Bruen-based invalidation of a gun law, a federal appeals court has struck a Minnesota law that prohibits 18 to 20-year-olds from being eligible for a carry permit, declaring the law to be invalid and ...

Third Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in NRA-ILA-Supported Challenge to Delaware’s ban on “assault weapons” and “large-capacity magazines.”

Tuesday, July 16, 2024

Third Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in NRA-ILA-Supported Challenge to Delaware’s ban on “assault weapons” and “large-capacity magazines.”

On Monday, July 15, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction in Delaware State Sportsmen’s Association v. Delaware Department of Safety & Homeland Security, NRA-ILA’s lawsuit challenging ...

District Court Denies Preliminary Injunction in NRA’s Challenge to New Mexico’s 7-Day Waiting Period Law

Tuesday, July 23, 2024

District Court Denies Preliminary Injunction in NRA’s Challenge to New Mexico’s 7-Day Waiting Period Law

Yesterday, in Ortega v. Grisham, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against New Mexico’s law requiring individuals to wait 7 ...

VA Tells Congressional Panel it “Could Not” and “Would Not” Comply with Pro-gun Legislation

News  

Monday, July 15, 2024

VA Tells Congressional Panel it “Could Not” and “Would Not” Comply with Pro-gun Legislation

Last Wednesday, the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs of the House Veterans Affairs Committee held a legislative hearing on a number of proposed bills that would change various procedures and standards for how the Department ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.